|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Science-Pacific Region-Ocean Sciences-People-Steve
Romaine home page
STEVE ROMAINE - PUBLICATION ABSTRACTS Estimation of krill (Euphausia pacifica Hansen) biomass within semi-enclosed bodies of water. Stephen John Romaine, B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 1992. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences. Abstract A methodology combining acoustics and net tows was tested and evaluated on euphausiid biomass and distributions in two B.C. inlets adjoining the Strait of Georgia from 1991 to 1996. Better information concerning the reliability of seasonal and interannual variability of euphausiid stock size estimates as well as the within-time-period statistical reliability of these estimates was the goal of this thesis. Repeated surveys were conducted primarily in the spring and fall in both Jervis and Saanich Inlets, and monthly surveys were conducted in Jervis Inlet between June 1994-June 1995. Acoustic samples were the primary data source for biomass estimates, with net tows providing species composition and size-frequency distributions. Transects provided closely-spaced acoustic sample points along lines. Estimation of total stock size from samples required point observations to be converted into maps, and maps to be converted to integrated biomass estimates for the survey area. Block averages estimated stock sizes from a mosaic of equally weighted sample averages integrated over the survey area. The geostatistical interpolation method of kriging estimated unknown points within an area based on a function of spatial autocovariance and unique weightings applied to neighbouring measurements. Both acoustic estimation methods provided similar results, but kriging was the preferred method of choice as data points were considered spatially dependent for estimates and high resolution spatial distributions could be further displayed and analyzed. One source of uncertainty in stock size estimates based on linear acoustic transects was their repeatability. This uncertainty was evaluated by comparing results from independent survey grids between both transects and days. On a daily basis, estimates agreed to within 31-59% (2 standard deviations) and between survey grid agreement was within 46-63%. Seasonal variation of stock size due to predation, growth, and migration was on average about 1.3-2.6x greater than within time period variations due to statistical uncertainty. Monthly surveys of Jervis Inlet noted a bimodal biomass peaking in spring, followed by a large drop in early summer. A second peak occurred in October followed by a large winter decline. Less frequent sampling of Saanich Inlet showed higher average euphausiids stocks in the fall compared to the spring, and a similar winter decline. Broader coverage of Jervis Inlet noted an over-winter biomass decline similar to Saanich Inlet. Conversion from acoustic return to biomass was an additional source of uncertainty. A hybrid acoustic target strength model was developed to minimize this uncertainty by using seasonal size-frequency information combined with Macaulay's (1994b) model for euphausiid acoustic returns. The strong seasonal variation of size-frequency caused target strength conversion factors to vary up to a magnitude of four. Comparisons of repeat acoustic surveys of the euphausiid stock in Jervis Inlet, British Columbia: 1991-1996. David L. Mackas Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Biological Sciences Branch. Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, B.C.; Stephen J. Romaine School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.; Michael C. Macaulay Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.; David J. Saxby Biozyme Systems Inc. Vancouver, B.C. Abstract Management of euphausiid and other Strait of Georgia fisheries requires better information about seasonal and interannual variability of euphausiid stock size and the within-time-period statistical reliability of these stock size estimates. To provide this, we conducted repeated euphausiid surveys in Jervis Inlet over the past five years: twice per year (Oct-Nov and Jan-Feb) in most years since November 1991; and monthly June 1994 - June 1995. Underway echosounding gave spatially detailed measurements along zig-zag transect lines. Net tows (mostly discussed previously, Mackas and Moore 1994) provided species identification and size-frequency distributions. The steps in our analysis were:
Overall, we believe our within-time-period stock size estimates are reliable to about factor of 2.5. We partition the uncertainty as follows:
Total stock estimates ranged from a minimum of <1000 tonnes (Feb. 93) to a maximum of>10000 tonnes (April 95). Both seasonal and interannual components of variation were large (3-10 fold). In most years, acoustically-estimated stock biomass declined during the winter. Timing of the decline is coincident with the fishing season. But the magnitude of the winter decline (3000-6000 tonnes) is much greater than the removal by the fishery (less than 500 tonnes). We therefore attribute most of it to seasonal variation in the balance between growth and natural mortality. We conclude that present harvest levels are a small fraction of present stock size. Comparisons of repeat acoustic surveys in Jervis Inlet, British Columbia: 1994-1995. Stephen J. Romaine School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.; David L. Mackas Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Biological Sciences Branch. Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, B.C.; Michael C. Macaulay Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.; David J. Saxby Biozyme Systems Inc. Vancouver, B.C. Abstract Currently, most of the commercial harvest of euphausiids in British Columbia has come from either the outer portions of Jervis Inlet or the surrounding Strait of Georgia area. In order to provide better information regarding within-time-period statistical consistency of results from acoustic survey grids and seasonal variability of euphausiid stock size within Jervis Inlet, we obtained replicated monthly surveys between June 1994 and June 1995. Underway echosounding gave spatially detailed measurements along zig-zag transect lines. Net tows provided species identification and size-frequency distributions. We wanted to evaluate the variability of euphausiid stock size estimates due to the following sources: 1) Incomplete survey coverage (variability among within-time period replicate and alternative calculation methods); 2) Target strength assumptions; and 3) Month-to-month and seasonal changes in stock size. Various methods were employed to estimate the total stock size, including moving averages, linear kriging, and extrapolation from net tows at a small number of locations. Four different sets of biomass estimate comparisons were considered in this study:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||